Celebrity Preachers and The Commodification of Da'wah: A Comparative Study of Traditional Ulama Versus Influencer Hijrah in Indonesia
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.35964/almunawwarah.v18i1.544Keywords:
Commodified piety; celebrity preachers; hijrah influencer; political economy of da'wah; Indonesian IslamAbstract
The explosive growth of Islamic preaching content on Indonesian social media since 2015 has produced two strikingly different models of religious authority that share platform space but diverge in nearly every other respect. This article presents a comparative netnographic study of twenty Indonesian da'wah actors H ten traditional ulama grounded in pesantren scholarship and chains of transmission (Typology A) and ten hijrah influencers who built their authority primarily through digital charisma, lifestyle aesthetics, and commercial partnerships (Typology B) observed across YouTube, Instagram, and TikTok over twelve months (July 2024–June 2025). Drawing on 4,200 posts, engagement metrics for 2,400 content units, and semistructured interviews with eight participants, we identify three findings. First, divergent production logics: Typology A produces longform, minimally edited scholarly lectures oriented toward ta'lim (instruction), while Typology B produces shortform, dramatically edited entertainmentoriented content calibrated for algorithmic amplification. Second, a commodification continuum: Typology A maintains relative resistance to commercial partnerships, while Typology B intensively monetizes religious content through brand endorsements, merchandise, and paid events, framing commodification as a form of halal economic sustainability. Third, asymmetric algorithmic legitimacy: platform algorithms consistently reward Typology B with greater reach, yet commentsection dynamics reveal persistent counterlegitimation from audiences who invoke traditional scholarly credentials to challenge influencer authority. We propose the concept of commodified piety to describe a mode of religious performance in which spiritual, economic, and algorithmic value become structurally entangled, and argue that the political economy of platforms not merely individual ambition drives this entanglement.
References
Al atas, I. F. (2021). What is religious authority? Cultivating Islamic communities in Indonesia. Princeton University Press.
Baulch, E., & Pramiyanti, A. (2018). Hijabers on Instagram: Using visual social media to construct the ideal Muslim woman. Social Media + Society, 4(4).
Bruce, S. (1990). Pray TV: Televangelism in America. Routledge.
Bucher, T. (2018). If...then: Algorithmic power and politics. Oxford University Press.
Bunt, G. R. (2024). Islamic algorithms: Online influence in the Muslim metaverse. Bloomsbury Academic.
Febrian, H. (2024). Visualizing authority: Rise of the religious influencers on Instagram. Social Media + Society, 10(4).
Fuchs, C. (2014). Digital labour and Karl Marx. Routledge.
Gillespie, T. (2014). The relevance of algorithms. In T. Gillespie, P. J. Boczkowski, & K. A. Foot (Eds.), Media technologies (pp. 167–193). MIT Press.
Hoesterey, J. B. (2016). Rebranding Islam: Piety, prosperity, and a self-help guru. Stanford University Press.
Hoover, S. M. (1988). Mass media religion: The social sources of the electronic church. SAGE Publications.
Kozinets, R. V. (2015). Netnography: Redefined (2nd ed.). SAGE Publications.
Kozinets, R. V., & Gretzel, U. (2023). Netnography evolved. Annals of Tourism Research, 103, 103693.
Mosco, V. (2009). The political economy of communication (2nd ed.). SAGE Publications.
Rakhmani, I. (2017). Mainstreaming Islam in Indonesia: Television, identity, and the middle class. Palgrave Macmillan.
Raya, M. K. F. (2024). Digital religion: Packaging and persuasion of celebrity preachers. Journal for the Study of Religions and Ideologies, 23(67), 80–94.
Raya, M. K. F. (2025). Digital Islam: New space for authority and religious commodification. Contemporary Islam, 19(1), 161–194.
Rohmatullah, D. M., As'ad, M., & Malayati, R. M. (2022). Gus Baha, Santri Gayeng, and traditionalist preachers on social media. Journal of Indonesian Islam, 16(2), 303–325.
Saldaña, J. (2021). The coding manual for qualitative researchers (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.
Schmidt, L. (2021). Aesthetics of authority in Indonesian Islamic media. Religion, 51(2), 237–258.
Slama, M. (2018). Social media and Islamic practice: Indonesian ways of being digitally pious. International Journal of Asian Studies, 15(1), 1–25.
Srnicek, N. (2017). Platform capitalism. Polity Press.
Tabaika, M. A., Barizi, A., & Arif, Y. M. (2025). Digital da'wah and the reconstruction of Islamic authority. Al-Balagh, 10(2), 371–410.
van Dijck, J. (2013). The culture of connectivity. Oxford University Press.
van Dijck, J., Poell, T., & de Waal, M. (2018). The platform society. Oxford University Press.
Wahid, S. H., & Abdulloh, S. (2026). Digital Islamic authority: A revolutionary shift or mere hype? SN Social Sciences, 6, 62.
Downloads
- Pdf Downloads: 63
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Lalu Ahmad Zaenuri

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

