The Esoteric Ratio of Ecological Verses in the Perspective of Islamic Religious Education: An Interpretative Study of Tafsīr al-Kabīr Mafātīḥ al-Ghayb by Imam al-Rāzī
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.35964/al-munawwarah.v18i2.743Keywords:
Esoteric Ratio, Ecological Verses, Islamic Religious Education, Imam al-Rāzī, Tafsīr al-KabīrAbstract
This study explores the esoteric ratio of ecological verses within the framework of Islamic Religious Education by analyzing Imam al-Rāzī’s monumental work, Tafsīr al-Kabīr Mafātīḥ al-Ghayb. The research seeks to uncover how al-Rāzī’s interpretative method integrates rational inquiry with spiritual insight to address ecological themes in the Qur’an, particularly in relation to human responsibility toward nature as a manifestation of divine trust (amānah). Using a qualitative approach with interpretative textual analysis, the study examines selected verses that highlight ecological balance, environmental ethics, and the metaphysical dimensions of creation. The findings reveal that al-Rāzī not only provides a theological explanation of ecological verses but also emphasizes a philosophical-esoteric dimension where nature functions as a sign (āyah) pointing toward divine wisdom. This integration of rationality and esotericism offers a pedagogical implication for Islamic Religious Education by promoting ecological awareness rooted in spiritual values. Furthermore, the study concludes that al-Rāzī’s interpretation presents a holistic model of ecological consciousness, bridging the gap between rational exegesis, esoteric reflection, and contemporary environmental ethics. Such insights are highly relevant to current educational discourse, as they encourage a paradigm that unites faith, reason, and ecological responsibility. In conclusion, this research contributes to the enrichment of Islamic Religious Education by framing ecological issues not merely as environmental concerns but as integral to the spiritual and rational development of learners.
References
A. Mackey, D. (2013). Content Analysis. In J. S. Albanese (Ed.), The Encyclopedia of Criminology and Criminal Justice (1st edn, pp. 1–5). Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118517383.wbeccj002
Adamson, P. (2017). Fakhr al-Dīn al-Rāzī on Place. Arabic Sciences and Philosophy, 27(2), 205–236. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0957423917000029
Alijaya, A., Narlina, Maulida, N., & Nurhayati. (2025). Corak Pendidikan Teologis dalam Tafsir al-Kabir wa Mafatih al-Ghaib. AL-IBANAH, 10(1). https://doi.org/10.54801/1banah.v10i1.494
Al-Rāzī, F. al-Dīn. (1999). Mafātīḥ al-Ghayb. Dār al-Fikr.
Attar, M. F. (2014). Faḫr al-Dīn al-Rāzī on the Human Soul: A Study of the Psychology Section of al-Mabāḥiṯ al-mašriqiyya fī ʿilm al-ilāhiyyāt wa-l-ṭabīʿiyyāt [Thesis]. Institute of Islamic Studies McGill University, Montreal.
Azhari, M. (2013). KONSEP PENDIDIKAN SAINS MENURUT al-Rāzī (Telaah Terhadap Tafsir Mafātīḥ al-Ghayb). Jurnal Ilmiah Islam Futura, 13(1), 42. https://doi.org/10.22373/jiif.v13i1.571
Banerjee (Chatterjee), T. (2019). Designing a primary survey-based research. In R. Acharyya & N. Bhattacharya (Eds), Research Methodology for Social Sciences (1st edn, pp. 167–180). Routledge India. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780367810344-9
Bass, L., & Semetko, H. A. (2021). Content Analysis: On the Rise. In L. Bass & H. A. Semetko, Research Methods in the Social Sciences: An A-Z of key concepts (pp. 56–62). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/hepl/9780198850298.003.0013
Baxter, J. (2009). Content Analysis. In International Encyclopedia of Human Geography (pp. 275–280). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-008044910-4.00415-6
Breitmayer, B. J., Ayres, L., & Knafl, K. A. (1993). Triangulation in Qualitative Research: Evaluation of Completeness and Confirmation Purposes. Image: The Journal of Nursing Scholarship, 25(3), 237–243. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1547-5069.1993.tb00788.x
Britannica. (2023). Fakhr ad-Dīn ar-Rāzī. Encyclopaedia Britannica, Inc.
Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2014). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications. Sage Publications.
Firmansyah, B., Gama, C. B., & Ridho, A. Z. A. (2021). Fondasi Ontologis Tafsir Isyārī: Studi Pemikiran Haydar Amuli dalam Tafsir al-Muhīṭ al-A’ẓam. Jurnal Moderasi, 1(1), 1–30. https://doi.org/10.14421/jm.v1i1.2854
Hapid, H., & Hidayat, A. (2025). Tafsir Al Qur’an Tentang Pendidikan Memelihara Lingkungan. INTELEKTIUM, 6(1), 12–21. https://doi.org/10.37010/int.v6i1.1858
Hodgkinson, G. P. (2005). Research Methods and Design. In G. P. Hodgkinson, Images of Competitive Space (pp. 63–91). Palgrave Macmillan UK. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230510722_4
Hs, Ma. A. & Isnaini. (2020). Sufi Exegesis of the Qur’an and Its Public Controversy. 1st Raden Intan International Conference on Muslim Societies and Social Sciences (RIICMuSSS 2019), Bandar Lampung, Indonesia. https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.201113.010
Kalisdha, Dr. A. (2023). The Future of Library Science Research: Tools and Databases. International Journal for Research in Applied Science and Engineering Technology, 11(11), 700–707. https://doi.org/10.22214/ijraset.2023.56602
Latifnejad Roudsari, R. (2019). Qualitative description: A less sophisticated approach for junior qualitative researchers. Journal of Midwifery and Reproductive Health, 7(4). https://doi.org/10.22038/jmrh.2019.13927
Madugu, U., & Ibrahim, F. A. (2025). Six Questions for Every Content Analysis: Revisiting the Stemler’s Overview. International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, VIII(XII), 2788–2794. https://doi.org/10.47772/IJRISS.2024.8120233
Mihas, P. (2023). Qualitative research methods: Approaches to qualitative data analysis. In International Encyclopedia of Education(Fourth Edition) (pp. 302–313). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-818630-5.11029-2
Misbakhudin, M., Trisnani, A., & Sa’dullah, S. (2025). The Spiritual Dimension of Imran Hosein’s ‘Methodology for the Study of the Qur’an: The Relevance of Esoteric Approaches to Contemporary Tafsir. JOUSIP: Journal of Sufism and Psychotherapy, 5(1), 51–68. https://doi.org/10.28918/jousip.v5i1.12178
Mukhlis, F. H. (2022). PARADIGMA EKOLOGIS DALAM TAFSIR AL-QUR’AN: Kajian Tematik-Kontekstual. QOF, 6(1), 89–108. https://doi.org/10.30762/qof.v6i1.396
Neuendorf, K. A., & Kumar, A. (2016). Content Analysis. In G. Mazzoleni (Ed.), The International Encyclopedia of Political Communication (1st edn, pp. 1–10). Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118541555.wbiepc065
Price, L. L. (2010). Content Analysis. In J. Sheth & N. Malhotra (Eds), Wiley International Encyclopedia of Marketing (1st edn). Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781444316568.wiem02062
Reflita, R., & Syatri, J. (2020). Konstruksi Hermeneutika Tafsir Sufi. Mashdar: Jurnal Studi Al-Qur’an Dan Hadis, 2(2), 169–198. https://doi.org/10.15548/mashdar.v2i2.1675
Salmia, S., Sudarmin,. (2023). Development of quality instruments and data collection techniques. Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Pengajaran Guru Sekolah Dasar (JPPGuseda), 6(1), 119–124. https://doi.org/10.55215/jppguseda.v6i1.7527
Salsabila, L. (2024). Dari Esoteris ke Literal: Penafsiran ar-Rāzī terhadap Huruf Muqatṭa’ah dalam al-Qur’an. Contemporary Quran, 4(2), 153–166. https://doi.org/10.14421/cq.v4i2.5682
Seixas, B. V., Smith, N., & Mitton, C. (2017). The Qualitative Descriptive Approach in International Comparative Studies: Using Online Qualitative Surveys. International Journal of Health Policy and Management, 7(9), 778–781. https://doi.org/10.15171/ijhpm.2017.142
Steleżuk, A., & Wolanin, M. (2023). Primary research using quantitative methods in social sciences. Zeszyty Naukowe Wyższej Szkoły Technicznej w Katowicach, 16, 145–156. https://doi.org/10.54264/0069
Street, T. (1997). Concerning the Life and Works of Fakhr al-Dīn al-Rāzī. In Street & P. Riddell (Eds), Islam: Essays on Scripture, Thought and Society (pp. 135–146). BRILL. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004452091_013
Suci, A. W. (2025). Cinta Kepada Allah Dalam Prespektif Tafsir Sufi (Studi Atas Ayat-Ayat Mahabbah Dalam Tafsir Lathaif Al-Isyarat) [Undergraduate Thesis]. UIN K.H. Abdurrahman Wahid Pekalongan.
Tariq, M. U. (2025). Qualitative Inquiry in Doctoral Research: Pathways to Effective Design and Implementation. IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/979-8-3693-7200-5
Tunison, S. (2023). Content Analysis. In J. M. Okoko, S. Tunison, & K. D. Walker (Eds), Varieties of Qualitative Research Methods (pp. 85–90). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-04394-9_14
White, M. D., & Marsh, E. E. (2006). Content Analysis: A Flexible Methodology. Library Trends, 55(1), 22–45. https://doi.org/10.1353/lib.2006.0053
Wiesner, C. (2022). Doing qualitative and interpretative research: Reflecting principles and principled challenges. Political Research Exchange, 4(1), 2127372. https://doi.org/10.1080/2474736X.2022.2127372
Wiharya, T. (2020). Konsep Mujāhadah dalam tafsir Laṭāif Al-Isyārāt. Masters thesis, UIN Sunan Gunung Djati Bandung.
Wiyanda Vera Nurfajriani, M. W. I. (2024). Triangulasi Data Dalam Analisis Data Kualitatif. https://doi.org/10.5281/ZENODO.13929272
Yasmin, A. N., Fadilah, I. N., & Mutia, F. (2024). Reference Services in the library: Literature review. Pedagogi: Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan, 24(2), 150–158. https://doi.org/10.24036/pedagogi.v24i2.2051
Zuherni. (2017). Tafsir Isyari Dalam Corak Penafsiran Ibnu ’Arabi. Jurnal Ilmiah Al-Mu’ashirah, 13(2),131. https://doi.org/10.22373/jim.v13i2.2247
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Sohri Ramdana, Fahrurrozi Fahrurrozi, Iwan Fitriani, Abdullah Fuadi
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
